the eiffel tower is on fire?
it burned down on your feed this morning, 40k reposts deep. amige reads the pixels likely ai, and no camera-signed credential shows up to argue otherwise. paris is fine.
image, video, or text, amige. reads it against
every model that matters, names what made it,
and never fakes certainty.



image, video, or text — checked against 90+ generative models in one place.
not just “it’s AI.” amige. says which model it resembles, when it’s confident.
amige. routes each scan to the detectors strongest for it, then fuses them into one verdict. disagreement shown, never averaged away.
every read is a probability, never a proof. it tells you how sure it is, and says “uncertain” rather than guess.
a scan is read, routed, weighed by a panel, then fused & calibrated — landing on a probability, never a proof. watch one go through.
how it works, in full →How an amige. scan works, step by step. First, the content you drop — an image, video, or text — is read for signal. Before any verdict, amige. takes two quick looks that guide the scan but never score it: a routing hint that points toward the detectors most likely to read this kind of content well, and a novelty check that notices when something is unusual so the engine treads more carefully. The novelty check only flags that the content is unusual; it never claims what made it, and it is not a new-generator detector. Next, a panel of independent detectors — built by different teams on different data — each weigh in on their own. They do not all agree, and the disagreement is kept on display, not averaged away. Their readings are then fused and calibrated into a single estimate: combining only tempers confidence, it never inflates it, and the result is capped so a verdict never reads 0 percent or 100 percent. The outcome is one of three honest calls — likely AI, likely human, or uncertain — always a probability, never a proof. When the panel splits or the content is unusual, amige. holds the verdict back as uncertain rather than guess. The readings shown in the animation are illustrative of a single scan and are not accuracy claims.
it burned down on your feed this morning, 40k reposts deep. amige reads the pixels likely ai, and no camera-signed credential shows up to argue otherwise. paris is fine.
matched monday, rome selfie by tuesday. perfect skin, perfect light, no such person. amige reads the face likely ai before you start learning italian.
the mouth lands late and the blink comes in wrong. amige runs the clip frame by frame and reads it likely ai. hang up, call back on the number you already had.
a dumbo loft with the brooklyn bridge filling the window, at half the going rent. no landlord took this photo. amige reads the listing likely ai. keep your deposit.
cave walls, plunge pool, the caldera out the open door, and a nightly rate that makes no sense. amige reads the listing likely ai before the “host” stops answering.
a grail colorway back at retail price at 2am. zoom on the wings logo: the letters spell nothing. amige reads the shot likely ai before checkout does the damage.
same swirls, same stars, no van gogh. a model can wear an artist’s whole style. amige reads the brushwork likely ai and names the tool it resembles. receipts for the group-chat art historians.
five stars, zero humans. pangram, winston and ai-or-not all land on likely ai. and amige says when it isn’t sure: non-native english reads “too clean” too.
it burned down on your feed this morning, 40k reposts deep. amige reads the pixels likely ai, and no camera-signed credential shows up to argue otherwise. paris is fine.
matched monday, rome selfie by tuesday. perfect skin, perfect light, no such person. amige reads the face likely ai before you start learning italian.
the mouth lands late and the blink comes in wrong. amige runs the clip frame by frame and reads it likely ai. hang up, call back on the number you already had.
a dumbo loft with the brooklyn bridge filling the window, at half the going rent. no landlord took this photo. amige reads the listing likely ai. keep your deposit.
cave walls, plunge pool, the caldera out the open door, and a nightly rate that makes no sense. amige reads the listing likely ai before the “host” stops answering.
a grail colorway back at retail price at 2am. zoom on the wings logo: the letters spell nothing. amige reads the shot likely ai before checkout does the damage.
same swirls, same stars, no van gogh. a model can wear an artist’s whole style. amige reads the brushwork likely ai and names the tool it resembles. receipts for the group-chat art historians.
five stars, zero humans. pangram, winston and ai-or-not all land on likely ai. and amige says when it isn’t sure: non-native english reads “too clean” too.
a panel of independent detectors, fused into one honest verdict. how amige.’s ensemble fails less catastrophically than any single classifier. limitations included.
synthetic audio, image, or video that depicts a real person. three subtypes, 2024 election context, the harm that’s actually rising.
the highest-traffic AI tool in history. GPT-3.5 through GPT-5, the writing tells that give it away, and how amige. catches it.
no single tool wins every case. the image, video, and text detectors ranked by what they’re actually good at — bias disclosed, weaknesses named.
“99% accurate” is doing a lot of work. a 30-sample blind protocol — human, AI, and hybrid — to check any detector’s claim yourself, ours included.
physics first, watermark second. the morphing backgrounds, off-beat hair, and liquid that behaves wrong — the tells that give OpenAI’s video model away.
amige. is an AI content detector. drop in an image, video, or text and it detects whether content is likely AI-generated or human-made, then names the most likely model behind it, like ‘looks like Midjourney v6’.
yes. there is a free tier of 3 scans a day, and you can run one without an account. paid plans add higher image and video limits plus unlimited text.
amige. runs a panel of independent detectors and shows where they agree or disagree, with a per-detector breakdown. no detector is perfect, and accuracy drops on heavily edited or re-shared media, so amige. surfaces the reasoning behind each verdict.
yes. amige. runs deepfake-specific checks on images and video alongside the general AI-generation detectors, and flags the most likely manipulation type in the result.